the copywriting is fine, the ice melting analogy to explain system loss is great but the production values showed it was a rush job. the lighting was ok but it was not very professional. more importantly, and this i think is key is judy ann santos was not engaging, she did not elicit sympathy. i think the director gave judy ann santos the wrong directions. the director most likely told judy ann to deliver the lines and look that way because it was a "serious" topic. and that's how judy ann delivered her lines - a straightforward delivery.
but that kind of delivery took away the charm of judy ann santos. she is a tv and movie superstar, she caters to millions of her fans and we don't like to see her as a serious actress when we see her in things other than in her mivies. we all know she is not an engineer, nor an academe nor an economist, the ad agency got her for her popularity as a movie and tv superstar. and we like to see judy ann as warm, amiable and engaging. that's how we want to see her.
this directorial treatment was a bad call for the director.
the controversy over the tv ad rages on. i like the print ad released by meralco where it said the issue is not judy ann santos, the issue is "system loss".
that is precisely correct.
the pro-administration defenders have been lashing out on judy ann santos herself, taking it too personal which is highly unwarranted.
i suppose this over-reaction and personal attacks on the commercial talent is a tribute to the impact and power of the ad.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c72ca/c72ca99093e3fae3fb75cefbe5ab01e3f15a616b" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment
we encourage everyone to post a comment, their own analysis or views on any of the posts in WAWAM!
we have put all comments to be moderated to make it easy to monitor them and so that WAWAM! can respond to them.
we will not tolerate rudeness or idiocy in this blog. comments that contain personal attacks on any person or posters in this blog will be rejected.
otherwise, we will allow all other comments.